Argument
This article I felt that it was
just one big contradicting to itself.
The saying “Boys will be Boys” is
the biggest understatement in this whole article. Saying that boys will always
choose a form of violence when acting out or to solve their problems. Because
of “Guys” testosterones this always them and gives them the reason to behave as
such. [Gurian]
But both Gurian and Biddulph
believe that the environment, which a boy grew up, is not the reason why boys
act in such a violence and heinous matter. But it is in their biological
coding. In the article they make a statement saying that if you let boys be who
they are, than it would put them in the right path to a health direction; or in
the author’s word “steer”. Really what a JOKE!!! So
you are to tell me by letting them misbehave they will in the end be steer in
the path of good. So to turn things back around if “steering” the boys is not
caused by their testosterones than it would be the environment around them that
influenced them. Yes testosterone
cause boys to be aggresses but this is not the lonely factor to look out.
What do you see/think about in these pictures?
No comments:
Post a Comment